Trade union Solidarity is asking the court to set aside the decision to dismiss the SABC journalists and to revoke the disciplinary process in its entirety, pending the rulings given in the various legal processes against the controversial censorship decision taken by the SABC’s Chief Operating Officer, Hlaudi Motsoeneng. Solidarity is representing Foeta Krige (pictured – left), Suna Venter, Krivani Pillay and Jacques Steenkamp. The other journalists’ cases are being handled by their own trade unions and legal teams.
But the SABC’s legal quacks said they were not ready for the case. The court then granted the postponement to serve papers by 7pm with the case postponed to tomorrow (22 July) at 12:300m.
Solidarity Chief Executive Dr Dirk Hermann says despite the recent Icasa ruling and the High Court judgment yesterday, the SABC has, “with their delaying tactics, once again shown its disregard for legal processes in South Africa. It would appear as if the SABC is of the opinion that it is above the country’s legal system. Given the SABC’s recent actions we have, however, expected nothing else from the SABC”.
Hermann added that the trade union would not let itself be deterred by the SABC. “We will continue to fight so justice will prevail for those journalists.”
Solidarity is expected to also request that the SABC establish who in the organisation was responsible for the decision to dismiss the journalists, and that the court grant a cost order against those persons in their individual capacity.
“The SABC’s decision to dismiss the journalists without a hearing is totally unlawful. The SABC was aware of it but nevertheless proceeded. There must be consequences for intentional unlawful conduct,” says Hermann.
According to Solidarity, the SABC showed contempt for South African courts by proceeding to dismiss the journalists amid legal processes that are under way. “The SABC’s case is aggravated by the fact that an existing Icasa ruling declares the SABC’s censorship decision unlawful in terms of the Broadcasting Act and the South African Constitution. This Icasa decision stands until invalidated by the Supreme Court in a review process… If the SABC’s decision is unlawful then all actions arising from it, such as the disciplinary processes, would also be unlawful. From a legal and moral perspective the right thing to do would have been to revoke the disciplinary processes with immediate effect. The SABC did the opposite by firing the journalists.”
